Medizinische Kurznachrichten der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Endokrinologie
(Prof. Helmut Schatz, Bochum)

Bitte beachten Sie den Haftungsausschluss für medizinische Themen.

Endocrinology – quo vadis?


Bochum, 11. August 2025:

Vom 16.-22. April 2026 findet in Madrid die 1st Conference on Unified Research in Education, Science, and Medicine (CURESM) statt. Dort soll als Thema auch die Endokrinologie diskutiert werden, unter den Gesichtspunkten, welche der Referent (H.S.) in einem Editorial der Zeitschrift „Sci forschen – International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolic Disorders im Jahre 2015 besprochen hatte. H.S. wurde vom Organisationskomitee eingeladen, als Gast der Gesellschaft an diesem Kongress teilzunehmen und, falls gewünscht, neuere Aspekte dazu vorzutragen. Da die in seinem Editorial diskutieren Punkte heute nach wie vor Gültigkeit haben, zum Teil noch verstärkt, soll dieses auch im Blog der DGE publiziert werden (Copyright bei H.S.).

***

In 1849, Adolph Arnold Berthold, both medical doctor and zoologist working at the University of Göttingen, Germany, removed the testicles from male chicken. After castration they did not develop to roosters. When he re-implantated the testes, the chicken developed to normal cocks with characteristic cockscomb and big tail feathers. Berthold can thus be regarded as a pioneer of modern endocrinology. Before his fundamental experiment, endocrine disorders were thoroughly observed and described in detail only. [A.A. Berthold, * 1803 in Soest , + 1861 in Göttingen, Pioneer of Endocrinology (Figure 1: Arnold Adolph Berthold, pioneer of endocrinology. Commemorative tablet in Göttingen).

Also the fathers of modern diabetology, in many countries like Russia or Switzerland still an integrated subdiscipline of endocrinology, worked within the German borders, which included Breslau/Wroclaw and Straßburg/Strasbourg at that time: Paul Langerhans ,* 1847 Berlin, + 1988 Funchal/Madeira; Josef von Mering, * 1848 Cologne, + 1908 Halle/Saale; Oskar Minkowski ,* 1858 Kaunas/Lit., + 1931 Fürstenberg (Figure 2).

Artur Biedl wrote the classical first comprehensive textbook on endocrinology in 1910 in German language (“Innere Sekretion”, part I and II, three editions until 1916 (Figure 3). And the first scientific journal devoted exclusively to endocrinology appeared in 1928 named “Endokrinologie”. It still exists, with the new name in English “Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes”, the author being its “Honorary Editor-in-Chief.

Therefore, Germany may be named the “cradle of endocrinology”.

Endocrine societies are interdisciplinary. Their members, e.g. those of the German Endocrine Society (founded 1953, Lit. 1) comprise internists, pediatricians, gynecologists, specialists in nuclear medicine, urologists, surgeons, neurosurgeons, psychiatrists, preclinical specialists, molecular biologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, molecular biologists, zoologists, comparative endocrinologist, geneticists, and others. However, most of the members of endocrine societies are internists.

Clinical Endocrinology flourished and big progress was made in diagnosis and treatment of endocrine disorders in the last decades. A constantly increasing number of endocrine disorders can be explained on a molecular basis now, and detection of mutations in biopsies or tissue probes are already used for classification and personalized therapy, e. g. in thyroid cancer, or in pituitary adenomas. In the general population, however, the expression “endocrinology” is largely unknown, in contrast to e.g. cardiology, gastroenterology or oncology. For clinical endocrinology two major problems are existing nowadays:

The situation in the practice: In many countries including Germany every doctor can get the results of hormonal determinations of his patients from laboratories today. The laboratories have taken away the “instruments” developed by the endocrinologists, e.g. the immunoassays. So it is financially not easy for many endocrinologists to exist without getting honoraria for endocrine determinations which they have to interpret. This is far more than printing a “plus” or “minus” sign by the laboratory computer when a value lies outside the “normal range” (which is, as a matter of fact, a “reference range” meaning that 5% outside can also be “normal”). Instead of the practicing endocrinologist, big laboratories are now getting the money from the insurance companies or the patients directly in most of the cases. As a consequence, many practicing endocrinologists in Germany have already abandoned their office and became employees of such laboratories with a fixed salary.

The situation in hospitals: In many countries the number of doctors for a departments is based on the number of beds for patients of a discipline. Endocrinology is , however, mostly an out-patient discipline . Is Endocrinology accepted as an important, own discipline in many fields of medicine? The situation appears for me very similar to the specialty “Clinical Immunology”. Such a discipline has been established in the 1970-ties, and it has resulted in “Departments of Clinical Immunology” at some university clinics. However, these departments disappeared after short time because patients e.g. with rheumatoid arthritis and asthma went on to consult rheumatologists and pulmonologists, respectively, and not such new “clinical immunologists”. Although the angiotensin-receptor neprilysin-inhibitor (ARNI) is based on two endocrine mechanism patients with heart failure will not go to an endocrinologist but to a cardiologist [Lit. 2]. The same holds true for myopia: dopamine production in the retina protecting the eyeball from elongation is diminished when not enough bright day light is reaching the eye in children and adolescents, obviously leading to myopia. Short-sighted patients, however will, of course, visited ophthalmologists and not endocrinologists [Lit.3].

The endocrine departments are thus shrinking which becomes a big problem especially at university clinics. Therefore, it appears absolutely necessary that endocrinology and diabetology stay together and do not separate: Endocrinology has a big number of clinical pictures which are often very complex and demanding, with a scientifically highly interesting background. But they can be diagnosed and treated mostly as out-patients. Diabetology, on the other hand, needs more beds for patients which have to be hospitalized. Hospitals are often not licensed to treat out-patients. This results in too small numbers of jobs for young doctors wanting to become endocrinologists at universities. It is thus difficult to educate and train sufficient endocrinologists. The situation may certainly vary between different countries with varying health care systems. The knowledge in the field of endocrinology is growing dramatically. Hundreds of hormonal substances, cytokines and other mediator substances have been and will be detected. Can, and shall all these new principles be integrated in a clinical specialty “endocrinology”? And what happens with the interaction of the microbiome and the virome with the endocrine system and metabolism? And with the topics of lifestyle- and anti-aging hormones as well as with hormonal doping control? Therefore, I do not agree with the view of the president of the German Association for Internal Medicine 2015, Michael Hallek from the University of Cologne: In his Presidential Address at the 121. Congress of the “Deutsche Gesellschaft für Innere Medizin” in Mannheim on 19 April 2015 he predicted an end of the classical disciplines of internal medicine, like gastroenterology, endocrinology, oncology and so on , in favor of units newly to be established based more on the underlying mechanisms of diseases, e.g. molecular biology. I am completely sure that patients with classical endocrine disorders will continue to visit clinical endocrinologists for diagnosis and treatment. The endocrinologists have to use the results of the new techniques like genome analyses or molecular biology. Apart from clinical questions, the wide field of known hormonal substances which may well exceed thousand in the future remains a wide field open for the many specialists which are now members of endocrine societies. Endocrinology will remain an integrative discipline.

Helmut Schatz, Bochum
Media Spokesman of the German Endocrine Society, Germany

References

1. Schatz H (2014) Endocrinology in Germany: Six decades “German Endocrine Society”. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 122: page I-IV.

2. Schatz H (2014) Endokrinologisch doppelter Therapieansatz bessert Herzinsuffizienz: Angiotensin-Rezeptor – Neprilysin Inhibition (ARNI) durch den dualen Inhibitor LZ696 von Novartis. DGE-Blog.

3. German Endocrine Society and German Ophthalmologic Society (2015) Lots of light sets neurotransmitters dopamine in the retina free – playing outdoors protects children from myopia. Press Release. Citation: Schatz H (2015) Endocrinology – quo vadis? Int J Endocrinol Metab Disord 1(1): http://dx.doi.org/10.16966/2380-548X.e10

Posted on by Prof. Helmut Schatz
This entry was posted in Allgemein. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Endocrinology – quo vadis?

  1. Erstmal herzlichen Glueckwunsch Herr Kollege Schatz zu dieser Ehre im Jahr 2026. Having worked in Germany, the USA and Australia, it has become increasingly clear to „follow the money trail“. Endocrine departments are typically not financially viable without acknowledging the downstream revenue from laboratory and imaging analyses. Otherwise, endocrinologists have to see many, many patients to „survive“ financially. In the USA, there are still many endocrinology divisions and there is a growing demand in metabolic medicine with the worldwide rise of obesity. Many hospitals started an inpatient diabetes service, as patients are rolling in from the emergency department not obtaining timely outpatient appointments. There is a large demand for endocrinologists and our program accepting 2 fellows per year has more than 220 applicants each year. Doximity just published the 2025 physician compensation report and Endocrinology is listed with $290,606.

Bitte kommentieren Sie diesen Beitrag!

- Kommentare sind auf 1000 Zeichen beschränkt. Bei Umgehen dieser Regelung durch mehrere aufeinanderfolgende Kommentare werden diese gelöscht.
- Wir schätzen eine wissenschaftlich-sachliche Diskussion.
- Bei erbetenen Fernberatungen hat der Leser zu entscheiden, inwieweit er seine persönlichen Daten öffentlich bekanntgeben möchte (Datenschutz!)

Ihre E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert

 Verbleibende Zeichenanzahl

Mit dem Absenden des Formulars erklären Sie sich mit der Verarbeitung der übermittelten Daten einverstanden. Details hierzu finden Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.